If there is a theme to this year's U.S. presidential election, it is Barack Obama's small but consistent lead over Mitt Romney. It really is a sign of the current polarization of politics in America, where parties fight over a small number of undecided voters. It is a trend that has its roots in the divisive politics of the Gingrich lead Republicans in the 90s and accelerated with the election of George W. Bush in 2000. Even Obama's "landslide" win in 2008 was smaller than landslides of past eras and only made possible by the unprecedented unpopularity of Bush and a weak Republican candidate in John McCain. Obama won in 2008 with 53% of the vote compared to John McCain's 46% of the vote and with 365 electoral votes compared to 173. Compare that with Ronald Reagan's 1984 win over Walter Mondale in which Reagan carried every state but Minnesota and the District of Columbia, or Richard Nixon's 1972 win over George McGovern in which Nixon won the popular vote by a 61% to 38% margin and again won every state save for Massachusetts and DC. Today over half the states are automatic wins for one party or another. The chart below illustrates this trend more clearly. Democrat winners are in blue and Republican winners are in red. (I apologize for my poor Blogger skills, they don't make it easy to make tables)
Year Dem. candidate Rep. candidate popular vote electoral vote states won
1964 Johnson Goldwater 61 - 39 486 - 52 44 - 6
1968* Humphrey Nixon 43 - 43 301 - 191 32 - 13
1972 McGovern Nixon 61 - 38 520 - 17 49 - 1
1976 Carter Ford 50 - 48 297 - 240 23 - 27
1980 Carter Reagan 51 - 41 489 - 49 44 - 6
1984 Mondale Reagan 59 - 41 525 - 13 49 - 1
1988 Dukakis GHW Bush 53 - 46 426 - 111 40 - 10
1992 Clinton GHW Bush 43 - 38 370 - 168 32 - 18
1996 Clinton Dole 49 - 41 379 - 159 31 - 19
2000 Gore GW Bush 48 - 48 271 - 266 30 - 20
2004 Kerry GW Bush 51 - 48 286 - 251 31 - 19
2008 Obama McCain 53 - 46 365 - 173 28 - 22
(* in 1968 American Independent candidate George Wallace captured 5 states and 46 electoral votes with 14% of the popular vote)
The trend is quite obvious, the popular vote has become increasingly close, on average, while at the same time as like minded people become more and more concentrated in the same places, the number of safe states have increased for both parties (although the increase in states now out of play have been more pronounced for the Democrats). As the number of voters that can be influenced continues to dwindle, elections will continue to be fought in a handful of states where the two parties are more or less evenly matched.
No comments:
Post a Comment